For systems builders, integrators and OEMs
"The customer wants the system. The site cannot power what we quoted."
For builders, integrators and resellers whose customers' sites come up short on power: more of the quoted configuration fits the site's envelope, modelled from a runtime measured at up to 21% less GPU die power on NVIDIA H100 NVL.
The situation
Demand is there. Sites that can power the quote are scarce.
A configuration is sized, and the site comes back short on megawatts rather than floor space or budget.
The order then shrinks, divides across two sites, or waits for a connection nobody can date. The constraint sits at the customer's site, and the order that does not close sits in your pipeline.
ADAPT is software on the system you ship: a per-GPU runtime, driver-adjacent, in the bill of materials only as software. It changes what a fixed envelope carries, so more of the configuration fits.
What you are measured on
The lines this decision is judged against.
- Configurations that fit
- A customer envelope that now carries more of the quoted system is an order that keeps its size and its date.
- Compute per megawatt
- The currency a site owner converts everything else into, inside the envelope they hold.
- Your onboarding process
- What your process requires before a software line can be carried. The partners page sets out who answers what.
- Attribution
- Headroom from cooling or in-rack technology belongs to the platform and the silicon vendor. ADAPT's claim is software on an installed fleet.
- A result on the parts you ship
- Measured on NVIDIA H100 NVL. A paired baseline on a part you ship, the same design as the published run, makes that part measured too.
Released capacity
How it shows up, in megawatts and money.
The instrument's GB300 quick start: 60 GB300 NVL72 racks at 132 kW, 7,920 kW of draw, quoted into a 6,500 kW envelope.
From the 48-hour run on NVIDIA H100 NVL
- measured
Up to 21%
Less GPU die power
NVIDIA H100 NVL, one continuous 48-hour run, managed and baseline arms under an equal power cap, read as NVML GPU die power. Die power is a lower bound on wall power.
- derived
Up to +22%
Tokens per watt
From die power and serving throughput on the same run: the same work for less energy.
- derived
0%
Throughput change in the run
The same 48-hour run.
- observed
10 to 15 degrees C
Cooler at the die
Observed in the same testing.
Modelled on the quick start, whole numbers
Power the order needs off to fit
your own figureAbout 1,420 kW
7,920 kW of draw against a 6,500 kW envelope. Nothing of ours in it.
Power freed
modelledAbout 1,200 to 1,660 kW
7,920 kW of draw, from the conservative reading to the stated one.
The order against the envelope
modelledAbout 1,200 kW of the 1,420 kW gap closed, to the whole order with 2 racks spare
On the conservative reading the runtime closes about 1,200 kW of the 1,420 kW gap, and a baseline on the site shows which reading your racks follow. On the stated reading the whole order fits, with room for two more racks.
Capital the customer does not spend
modelledAbout GBP 11m to GBP 16m, one-off
Power freed times GBP 9.5m per megawatt, the average project capital cost of a data centre in the Ofgem consultation. On the conservative reading the build the customer still needs falls from about 1,420 kW to about 220 kW. Ofgem, Curate: Demand Connections Reform, consultation of 29 July 2026, paragraph 4.12.
| Figure | Value | Kind | Basis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Power the order needs off to fit | About 1,420 kW | your own figure | 7,920 kW of draw against a 6,500 kW envelope. Nothing of ours in it. |
| Power freed | About 1,200 to 1,660 kW | modelled | 7,920 kW of draw, from the conservative reading to the stated one. |
| The order against the envelope | About 1,200 kW of the 1,420 kW gap closed, to the whole order with 2 racks spare | modelled | On the conservative reading the runtime closes about 1,200 kW of the 1,420 kW gap, and a baseline on the site shows which reading your racks follow. On the stated reading the whole order fits, with room for two more racks. |
| Capital the customer does not spend | About GBP 11m to GBP 16m, one-off | modelled | Power freed times GBP 9.5m per megawatt, the average project capital cost of a data centre in the Ofgem consultation. On the conservative reading the build the customer still needs falls from about 1,420 kW to about 220 kW. Ofgem, Curate: Demand Connections Reform, consultation of 29 July 2026, paragraph 4.12. |
GB300 is modelled on the H100 NVL coefficient. Each range runs from the conservative reading to the stated one. The conservative reading applies the die figure to the accelerators' share of node draw. The stated reading treats die power as a floor on wall power. Hardware other than NVIDIA H100 NVL stays modelled until a baseline run on it.
Installing it
What installing it involves, and who signs.
For the reviewer: what installs, what it listens on, what it reads and keeps, and how it comes off.
ADAPT installs on the customer's hosts beside the driver, one service per accelerator. The thermal design, the cooling and the rack stay as shipped, and stopping the service releases the clocks.
The customer's own reviewer approves it from the security review. ADAPT is carried under its own name or introduced, the route is agreed with each partner in writing, and an account you introduce is recorded as yours.
Start with a paired baseline on a part you ship, and quote from your own measured figure.
- Your solutions or product lead
- Whether the line fits your catalogue and the quote.
- Your customer's platform owner
- The install on the fleet they own.
- Your customer's security reviewer
- What installs, what it touches and how it comes off.
- Commercial leads
- The route, carried or introduced, agreed in writing.
For the finance lead
- The largest pool sits on your customer's books: the build they do not bring forward, which is why a configuration that did not fit now fits.
- On your own books it shows up as an order that keeps its size and its date.
- Every modelled figure here recomputes in the quick start below, on the configuration you last quoted.
Case studies that fit
Situations like yours, worked through.
- Case study, modelledThe cluster being quotedA 2,880-accelerator cluster quoted while the architecture is still open.
- Case study, modelledNine megawatts into eightA 64-rack GB300 requirement fits an 8 MW site that holds 57 racks today, with 3 to 8 racks to spare, modelled.
- Case study, modelledThe gigawatt programmeThe same arithmetic at gigawatt scale.
Your own numbers
Run it on your site, then talk to us.
60 GB300 racks into 6,500 kW
Opens on 60 GB300 NVL72 racks quoted into a tight envelope. Swap in the configuration you last quoted.
Bring the last configuration that did not fit. We start with the site's envelope and the customer's day.
